Research finds that although organisations are introducing innovative technology they are failing to match this with innovation across the rest of the business
Businesses are failing to improve their productivity, despite decades of investment in technology.
Research by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a management consultancy, reveals that despite the push to digital technology, productivity across leading economies is falling.
In the 1970s, the 15 largest economies grew by 5% a year; today the growth rate is 1%, and in the UK productivity has been growing at 0% since 2006, according to Yves Morieux, senior partner in BCG’s People and Organisation practice.
The underlying problem, according to BCG, is that organisations are introducing innovative technology but are failing to match this with innovation in the rest of the business.
“Whenever we use new information and communication technologies without organisation innovations or collaboration, the impact on productivity is negative,” said Morieux.
The way companies organise work today is the same way they organised work 40 years ago, but the world has become much more complex, he told delegates at a human resources (HR) technology conference.
Digital, but still complex
Organisations have responded by digitising their businesses, leading to an explosion of chief digital officers and digital tsars in every organisation.
The result is that, rather than become more efficient, organisations have simply automated complexity, BCG’s research suggests.
Yves Morieux, Boston Consulting Group
Employees are“wasting” between 40% and 80% of their time on non-strategic work, but are working longer and harder.
And managers are spending so much time writing reports or attending meetings that, at most, they can only spend 30% of their time helping employees work more effectively.
When there is a problem with back office and front office communicating, companies create a middle office – and that makes the problem worse.
In one case a bank ended up with seven data systems because its employees were working in silos, rather than working together.